On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:46:13 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > @@ -447,7 +459,13 @@ static int lxcControllerMain(int monitor,
> > > ++numActive;
> > > }
> > > } else if (epollEvent.events & EPOLLHUP) {
> > > - VIR_DEBUG("EPOLLHUP from fd %d", epollEvent.data.fd);
> > > + if (lxcPidGone(container))
> > > + goto cleanup;
> > > + curFdOff = epollEvent.data.fd == appPty ? 0 : 1;
> > > + if (fdArray[curFdOff].active) {
> > > + fdArray[curFdOff].active = 0;
> > > + --numActive;
> > > + }
> > > continue;
> >
> > Heh, thanks for the opportunity to learn about epoll. This might be a
> > trivial
> > question but... what if we get EPOLLIN event immediately followed by
> > EPOLLHUP
> > on the same fd? Do we end up leaving the data unread until another EPOLLIN
> > arrives? Although it shouldn't be a big deal since we will just read the
> > data
> > from init after the console gets reopened by mingetty.
>
> The previous branch in this 'if' will have handled the EPOLLIN event
> so we shouldn't delay data.
Ah, right, I misread the long if statement and somehow thought we are first
reading out all the event and only when there are none are we actually copying
data over.
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
