On 04/12/2011 10:54 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > Commit 9677cd33eea4c65d78ba463b46b8b45ed2da1709 made it possible to > remove current entry when iterating through all hash entries. However, > it didn't properly handle a special case of removing first entry > assigned to a given key which contains several entries in its collision > list. > --- > This is an alternate less invasive fix to "util: Simplify hash > implementation". > I prefer the more invasive fix for upstream but I'm sending this alternative > here for completeness.
For backporting purposes, would it make sense to apply this patch first, then apply the other one which undoes this patch as part of its simplifications? Then, anyone trying to pick and choose patches to backport can feel justified going with the smaller patch in isolation. As for this patch itself, ACK, but whether to apply it depends on the answer to the bigger question above. -- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
