On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:51:17 -0400 Laine Stump <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/24/2011 07:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > We already have a public virDomainPinVcpu, which implies that > > Pin and Vcpu are treated as separate words. Commit e261987c > > introduced virDomainGetVcpupinInfo as the first public API > > that used Vcpupin, although we had prior internal uses of that > > spelling. For consistency, change the spelling to be two > > words everywhere, regardless of whether pin comes first or last. > > I think this should get more consensus before being committed, but my > vote is to change it to "Pin". Aside from consistency, it's easier to read. So do I. I think "VcpuPin" is good if it is not disliked that "VcpuPin" coexists with "PinVcpu". -- Taku Izumi <[email protected]> -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
