On 07/19/2011 10:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The motivation for using O_DIRECT is that allowing pollution of the host cache causes stability problems for the host as a whole. As such IMHO, apps would likely want an error back if O_DIRECT cannot be supported, NB, even some Linux filesystems can't do O_DIRECT, so this isn't an obscure mingw32 issue.
Conversely, open() on Linux silently ignores unknown flags - so if you are using a really old kernel but newer glibc headers, then O_DIRECT is non-zero and open() succeeds, but you _don't_ get direct I/O.
If O_DIRECT is 0, then it is pretty easy to diagnose that the request is unsupported. But if O_DIRECT is non-zero, then how do I tell whether the open(O_DIRECT) really meant that I have direct I/O, or whether it was a nice hint but still ignored and I'm still polluting the file system cache?
-- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
