When a detail message is presented, nobody expects prefix 'invalid
argument in' but something more general, like 'invalid argument:'.
---
src/util/virterror.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virterror.c b/src/util/virterror.c
index c5babb1..f4541bd 100644
--- a/src/util/virterror.c
+++ b/src/util/virterror.c
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ virErrorMsg(virErrorNumber error, const char *info)
if (info == NULL)
errmsg = _("invalid argument in");
else
- errmsg = _("invalid argument in %s");
+ errmsg = _("invalid argument: %s");
break;
case VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED:
if (info != NULL)
--
1.7.3.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
