2011/10/19 David Stevens <[email protected]>:

>              I also think that nwfilters ought to reflect the underlying
> filter
> mechanisms as much as possible. Really, I'd prefer they were simply
> parameterized shell scripts of ebtables/iptables commands run at significant
> events (start-up, shutdown, migrate) instead of XML-encoded things. Then
> the full feature sets of ebtables/iptables would be available "for free",
> instead
> of requiring libvirt patches to, e.g., add "return/continue" or multiple
> chains.

Well, you miss the point that nwfilters is meant as a general firewall
interface. ebtables/iptables just happens to be an implementation of
this interface. Using ebtables/iptables specific shell scripts would
replace the generic interface with something specific to
ebtables/iptables.

The general nwfilters interface allows to have an ebtables/iptables
based implementation for the Linux based hypervisors and an ipfw based
implementation for FreeBSD and other implementations that are specific
to VirtualBox, ESX, Hyper-V, PowerHypervisor etc. How well the
nwfilters interface maps to all those different firewalls is another
question, but with this general interface there is at least the
possibility to configure the different firewalls of different
hypervisors via libvirt.

-- 
Matthias Bolte
http://photron.blogspot.com

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to