On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> The way it's done is just a band-aid though. The need for this
> 'type' member in GVirConfigInterface and GVirConfigDeviceDisk is
> a clear indication that they should be separate class.

You mean there should be a seperate class for source type?

otherwise, patch looks fine

-- 
Marc-André Lureau

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to