On 01/19/2012 12:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> +
>> +VIR_ENUM_DECL(virTypedParameter)
>> +VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virTypedParameter, VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING + 1,
> 
> I'm slowly coming to the view that we should juust add "_LAST" to
> every single one of our public enums.
> 
> But perhaps have them disabled by default, unless the app developer
> does
> 
>   #define LIBVIRT_ENUM_SENTINALS
> 
> before including libvirt.h, so they make a concious decision to use a
> enum value known to change.

Sounds like an interesting idea, but I'll save it for a followup.

Would it be acceptable to protect existing _LAST values when adding all
the new ones, or must we keep those unconditionally defined to avoid
breaking compilation of anyone that was using them?

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to