Hello Eric,

On Thursday 19 January 2012 21:38:22 Eric Blake wrote:
> That's an unusual mix, where the syscall exists (since 2.6.27) but libc
> is too old to use the syscall.

The original kernel was 2.6.26, but which later was updated to 2.6.32 for 
better support of newer hardware.

> Then how about this patch:
>
> From 330f666036943a0fc423a4b5db2ca294fb2a4298 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:35:39 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] build: skip lxc with too-old glibc
...

Looks good: Now the missing support is detected and LXC is automatically 
disabled or refuses to compile. I did NOT test if it still compiles on newer 
systems.

> Reported by Philipp Hahn.
You may add a "Testes-by: me" if needed.

Thank you for your work and the patch.

BYtE
Philipp
-- 
Philipp Hahn           Open Source Software Engineer      [email protected]
Univention GmbH        Linux for Your Business        fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
Mary-Somerville-Str.1  D-28359 Bremen                 fax: +49 421 22 232-99
                                                   http://www.univention.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to