Is this patch too much "new code" to push now? https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-March/msg01228.html
The reasons I ask are two-fold - 1) it sat for a long time before anybody reviewed it. 2) I just noticed that there is a bug in the existing code that fails to flag a change in bridge name as an error (although it does nothing with it), and this patch would remedy that, so in one way it could be considered a bugfix. -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
