Thanks Eric. I'd like to know if this issue will be resolved in later release of RHEL (e.g., RHEL 6.3), if yes, I think I can wait.
Regards, Qian > [please don't top-post on technical lists] > > On 04/15/2012 03:30 AM, Qian Zhang wrote: >> I think what happened to me is >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757382 which is a dead >> lock issue between libvirtd process and its child process. >> It looks this issue has been fixed for Fedora 16, any plan for RHEL 6.2? > > If you'd like this to be backported to RHEL 6.2, perhaps the best thing > to do is to open a support ticket to Red Hat specifically requesting > that this Fedora BZ be cloned to RHEL. > > -- > Eric Blake [email protected] +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org > -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
