On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:29:03 -0400 Corey Bryant <cor...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> I'm not clear on what the problem is with returning the same error class > >> for two different errors. Could you explain? I don't have a problem > >> changing it if it's an issue. > > > > Because an mngt app/user won't know if what has happened was that the fd > > name > > is invalid or if the fd name already exists. > > > > I agree, it makes sense so the management app can program based on the > error class. It just seems like the error classes in general should be > able to be used multiple times if it fits, especially if we're trying to > avoid having too specific errors. > > Maybe (in the future) something like a sub-class could be used? In other > words to allow using the same error class with unique sub-classes. There's a discussion going on which is more or less the same topic: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg02243.html -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
