On 09/17/2012 05:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/17/2012 03:48 AM, Laine Stump wrote: >> virNetworkAssignDef was allocating a new network object, initing and >> grabbing its lock, then potentially freeing it without unlocking or >> destroying the lock. In practice 1) this will probably never happen, >> and 2) even if it did, the lock implementation used on most (all?) > This is probably a safe claim for Unix-like systems, but mingw can be > rather surprising, and I think actually leaks resources in this scenario.
Yeah, I can easily imagine that, which is why it bothered me. >> platforms doesn't actually hold any resources for an initialized or >> held lock, but it still bothered me, so I moved the realloc that could >> lead to this bad situation earlier in the function, and now the mutex >> isn't inited or locked until we are assured of complete success. >> --- >> src/conf/network_conf.c | 11 +++++------ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > ACK. > This also doesn't need the rest of the series, so I'll push now to avoid the rush. Thanks! -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
