On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 09/28/2012 03:58 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote: >> As an example, an OpenFlow controller may have certain information about the >> port, specific to this controller, which it may want to store with the port >> itself on the >> host. This especially true if an agent exists on the host which needs to >> read this data, >> update it, and use it to perform some tasks. It's convenient to have this >> data stored >> as close to the port itself, which in this case is the OVS DB, and having it >> transferred >> as part of the migration protocol is also very handy. >> > > But how big is it, and what does it look like? (I assume it's all > printable ASCII, since you're getting it as the output of a shell command) > > If it's *really* large, possibly it would go better as a subelement of > <interface>, rather than an attribute, i.e.: > > <interface index='1' vporttype='openvswitch'> > <portdata> > blah blah blah blah > </portdata> > </interface>
Yes. it's all printable ASCII. I think at the largest, it's possible for it to be up to a few K (e.g. 2-4K or so). So perhaps making it a subelement would be the way to go. As for an example, let me talk to some controller people and see if I can scrounge one up. Thanks, Kyle -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
