On 10/12/2012 11:50 AM, Osier Yang wrote: > If the vcpu placement is "static", it's just fine to ignore the > def->cpumask if emulatorpin is specified. See more details in > PATCH 1/7. > --- > src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c > index f8a2bfd..63a51c4 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c > @@ -2618,7 +2618,8 @@ static int qemuProcessHook(void *data) > > /* This must be done after cgroup placement to avoid resetting CPU > * affinity */ > - if (qemuProcessInitCpuAffinity(h->driver, h->vm, h->nodemask) < 0) > + if (!def->cputune.emulatorpin && > + qemuProcessInitCpuAffinity(h->driver, h->vm, h->nodemask) < 0) > goto cleanup; > > if (qemuProcessInitNumaMemoryPolicy(h->vm, h->nodemask) < 0) >
I think it is more readable in qemuProcessInitCpuAffinity, makes more sense to me, what do you think? Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
