On 2012年10月22日 21:44, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/22/2012 03:15 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
It reports error "roots and --from are exclusive" even "--current"
is specified with "--roots", but no "--from".
---
tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh-snapshot.c b/tools/virsh-snapshot.c
index b828371..6dd8bf2 100644
--- a/tools/virsh-snapshot.c
+++ b/tools/virsh-snapshot.c
@@ -1197,7 +1197,8 @@ cmdSnapshotList(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
}
if (from) {
vshError(ctl, "%s",
- _("--roots and --from are mutually exclusive"));
+ _("--roots is mutually exclusive with either "
+ "--from or --current"));
goto cleanup;
}
flags |= VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_LIST_ROOTS;
And is --from and --current also mutually exclusive?
No from the logic, but better to have Eric's input.
If yes, wouldn't
it be better to say something like: "--roots, --current and --from are
mutually exclusive"? Or, similarly to the idea behind vshLookupSnapshot
if (exclusive&& current&& snapname) {
vshError(ctl, _("--%s and --current are mutually exclusive"), arg);
return -1;
}
If it's not the case, than ACK.
Martin
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
