On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:32:38AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: > On 11/22/12 11:03, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > > I'll rework it to make it "as URI as possible" then. Just one question, > > though (for anyone, I guess); why do we append port as a parameter for > > spice scheme? > > > > Martin > > > > I think it's because of what spicy supported initially (since v0.1.0): > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=f0693b9f949ba > > spice://<host>:<port> is supported since v0.8 > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=b4c72ece9ca3b > > and spice://<host>:<port>/ (with the trailing slash) since v0.12 > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=50add15ef69cd
Another thing to keep in mind is that you can have both a port and a secure port (over which data will transit through SSL). Christophe
pgpWUa4VXBGk6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
