On 02/15/2013 12:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Although in IPv4 one must pick either mac or name, either > can be omitted. Similarly, for IPv6, the name > can be optionally omitted. > Signed-off-by: Gene Czarcinski <[email protected]> > --- > docs/schemas/network.rng | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/docs/schemas/network.rng b/docs/schemas/network.rng > index 09d7c73..a479453 100644 > --- a/docs/schemas/network.rng > +++ b/docs/schemas/network.rng > @@ -281,7 +281,9 @@ > <optional> > <attribute name="mac"><ref > name="uniMacAddr"/></attribute> > </optional> > - <attribute name="name"><text/></attribute> > + <optional> > + <attribute name="name"><text/></attribute> > + </optional>
Hmm. This says that I can omit both name and mac, and still validate.
Better would be this RelaxNG construct, which says that I must supply at
least one, but can also supply both; the difference is that failure to
supply either will cause a (desired) validation failure.
<choice>
<group>
<attribute name="mac"><ref name="uniMacAddr"/></attribute>
<optional>
<attribute name="name"><text/></attribute>
</optional>
</group>
<attribute name="name"><text/></attribute>
</choice>
I know Laine already ack'd but since we haven't pushed yet, I'm
wondering if it is worth tightening the grammar.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
