On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:58:39PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 27/02/2013 17:19, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: > >> > > >> > If it is meant as a prototype only, and the final command-line syntax > >> > would be with repeated keys, that's okay. I think that Eduardo/Markus/I > >> > are focusing on the user interface, you're focusing in the > >> > implementation. > >> > > >> > In the meanwhile, however, it seems to me that Eduardo can use > >> > QemuOptsVisitor---which can also hide the details and provide type > >> > safety. > > Whatever I use to implement it, I still need to know how the > > command-line syntax will look like, because we need to tell libvirt > > developers how they should write the QEMU command-line. > > I don't think any syntax makes sense except cpus=A,cpus=B. How we > implement it is another story.
I agree completely, and I still don't know why Anthony doesn't like it. -- Eduardo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
