2013/5/2 Eric Blake <[email protected]>: > On 05/01/2013 12:44 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> --- >> src/esx/esx_vi_generator.py | 430 >> ++++++++++++------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-) > > My python is weak, so I reviewed this by comparing the generated files > before and after this patch; added comments in the generated code are > nice, but there are also some added frees. Are these additions > intentional to fix a leak, or are they representing a bug in your patch? > If intentional, then this is 1.0.5 material if you improve the commit > message and push in time; if accidental and no real bug is being fixed, > then a v2 should wait until after the release.
The changes in the generated files you're seeing here are intended, but they are coming from another patch that I pushed yesterday: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=4e650435edeb2870c907721ea8b11380256bf6a7 This refactoring patch should not change the output at all. And it didn't in my test. -- Matthias Bolte http://photron.blogspot.com -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
