I tested on 1.0.5 patched version and vm with 2 vfs working fine. I have another problem When i set max_vfs=63: internal error missing IFLA_VF_INFO in netlink response
Its working when max_vfs=31 -- Dominik 21 maj 2013 15:19, "Dominik Mostowiec" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Hmm, > It seems to be working (after only simple tests). > > -- > Dominik > > > 2013/5/21 Ján Tomko <[email protected]> > >> On 05/21/2013 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> > On 05/21/2013 04:03 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: >> >> On 05/21/2013 09:32 AM, Dominik Mostowiec wrote: >> >>> hi, >> >>> I try to add 2 VF by "hostdev". >> >>> Networks (vnet0, vnet1) with: >> >>> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> >> >>> <pf dev='eth1'/> >> >>> ..... >> >>> >> >>> Domain: >> >>> <interface type="network"> >> >>> <source network="vnet0"/> >> >>> .... >> >>> <interface type="network"> >> >>> <source network="vnet1"/> >> >>> .... >> >>> >> >>> virsh create error: >> >>> "error: internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: >> kvm: >> >>> -device >> pci-assign,configfd=25,host=01:10.1,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: >> >>> Duplicate ID 'hostdev0' for device" >> >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> it seems we have been assigning the same id to all network hostdevs >> until this >> >> recent commit (not yet released): >> >> >> >> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=6597cc25 >> > >> > >> > If that patch has such an effect, it's purely accidental. Have you >> > tested this? (I plan to test a before and after as soon as I've had >> > breakfast) >> > >> >> I haven't tested it and looking at the code again, I might've been wrong >> :( >> >> Sorry about that. >> >> Jan >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Pozdrawiam > Dominik >
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
