On 10/04/2013 03:21 PM, Dave Allan wrote:
> As its summary says, BZ 1010824 requests that virsh suspend should
> raise error an error when called on a VM that's paused.  Is the
> current behavior correct?  

Or more importantly, would changing the behavior break backward
compatibility promises, where the best we can do is just document the
current behavior?

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to