Commit '922b7fda' resulted in two DEADCODE warnings from Coverity in remoteDispatchAuthPolkit and virAccessDriverPolkitFormatProcess. Commit '604ae657' modified the daemon.c code to remove the deadcode issue, but did not do so for viracessdriverpolkit.c. This just mimics the same changes
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <[email protected]> --- src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c b/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c index ff82583..b9907ba 100644 --- a/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c +++ b/src/access/viraccessdriverpolkit.c @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ virAccessDriverPolkitFormatProcess(const char *actionid) const char *callerTime = NULL; const char *callerUid = NULL; char *ret = NULL; - bool supportsuid = false; - static bool polkitInsecureWarned; +#ifndef PKCHECK_SUPPORTS_UID + static bool polkitInsecureWarned = false; +#endif if (!identity) { virAccessError(VIR_ERR_ACCESS_DENIED, @@ -109,19 +110,17 @@ virAccessDriverPolkitFormatProcess(const char *actionid) } #ifdef PKCHECK_SUPPORTS_UID - supportsuid = true; -#endif - if (supportsuid) { - if (virAsprintf(&ret, "%s,%s,%s", callerPid, callerTime, callerUid) < 0) - goto cleanup; - } else { - if (!polkitInsecureWarned) { - VIR_WARN("No support for caller UID with pkcheck. This deployment is known to be insecure."); - polkitInsecureWarned = true; - } - if (virAsprintf(&ret, "%s,%s", callerPid, callerTime) < 0) - goto cleanup; + if (virAsprintf(&ret, "%s,%s,%s", callerPid, callerTime, callerUid) < 0) + goto cleanup; +#else + if (!polkitInsecureWarned) { + VIR_WARN("No support for caller UID with pkcheck. " + "This deployment is known to be insecure."); + polkitInsecureWarned = true; } + if (virAsprintf(&ret, "%s,%s", callerPid, callerTime) < 0) + goto cleanup; +#endif cleanup: virObjectUnref(identity); -- 1.8.3.1 -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
