On 03/08/2014 09:57 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>   Eric Blake wrote:

>>>>>>> POSIX requires that <stdlib.h> expose WIFEXITED and friends,
>>>>>>> but FreeBSD and others fail to comply.  We can work around it
>>>>>>> manually by including <sys/wait.h>, or we can work around it
>>>>>>> automatically by using gnulib's system-posix module.

Except system-posix is currently LGPLv3+, which makes it incompatible
with libvirt unless gnulib relaxes it.

>>>> So, should I just ditch this patch?
>>>
>>> I don't feel strongly either way. ACK if you thing it is worth doing
>>> anyway.
>>
>> Roman, any thoughts, since you are the person most likely impacted by
>> this?  If we do the gnulib change, then future patches that assume POSIX
>> semantics, and pass testing when written by developers against glibc,
>> won't break the build on BSD; on the other hand, we've made virprocess.h
>> useful enough that most future patches shouldn't be using WIFEXITED
>> directly and therefore shouldn't trip up BSD compilation in the first
>> place.  Meanwhile, do you want to file a bug report to the BSD folks to
>> fix their <stdio.h>?
> 
> I think it's worth to include that patch because it costs nothing and
> helps not to occasionally spot this problem again in future.

I've dropped the patch for now (gnulib would have to relax the license
before I could use it, and that may take a while).

> 
> I'll make a bug report.

Thanks.  Looks like it spurred Garrett into investigating it further, as
he asked the POSIX folks more about the situation:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.posix.austin.general/9179

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to