Eric Blake wrote: > > BTW, that's going to be a vast change, quick grep shows more than 750 > > calls of that function. > > It doesn't invalidate any existing caller to make virObjectUnlock() > special-case NULL. And while it DOES make any existing caller that also > checks for NULL be a case of redundant code, we don't have to clean all > callers up in a single patch.
Good, so I'll add a check for NULL in virObjectUnlock() and prepare a series that cleans up the redundant if (obj) check before calling virObjectUnlock(obj), say, on per-driver basis. Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpPGrb6NFUPe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
