On 05/20/2014 10:16 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > Adding an option to 'virsh save' to not kill the guest doesn't make much > sense in general,
because memory state without matching disk state can't be used to resume a guest. > but might make sense for a diskless VM. Meanwhile, > don't we already have the option to kill or keep the guest alive after > an external memory snapshot? Here, I was thinking of VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_CREATE_HALT. Thus, 'virsh save $dom $file' appears to be shorthand for diskless 'virsh snapshot-create-as $dom --halt --memspec $file' -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
