On 07/14/2014 10:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>> }
>>>> - def->os.bios.useserial = VIR_DOMAIN_BIOS_USESERIAL_YES;
>>>> + def->os.bios.useserial = VIR_DOMAIN_YES_NO_ENABLED;
>>>> } else {
>>>> - def->os.bios.useserial = VIR_DOMAIN_BIOS_USESERIAL_NO;
>>>> + def->os.bios.useserial = VIR_DOMAIN_YES_NO_DISABLED;
>>>> }
>>>> if (def->data.spice.filetransfer)
>>>> virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<filetransfer enable='%s'/>\n",
>>>> -
>>>> virDomainGraphicsSpiceAgentFileTransferTypeToString(def->data.spice.filetransfer));
>>>> +
>>>> virDomainYesNoTypeToString(def->data.spice.filetransfer));
>>>> }
>>>
>>> I'm not really a fan of this cleanup, as IMHO the result is less clear &
>>> harder to follow than the original code.
>>
>> How so? The original code was very repetitive, with multiple enums (all
>> with long names) copying the same few enum elements. We're not painting
>> ourselves into a corner - if any of the replaced enums ever grows a
>> third value (such as "on", "hybrid", "off"), then we just break that one
>> enum back into a named list rather than using the generic on/off enum.
>> I'm actually in favor of this cleanup.
>
> Specifically a enum constant name like YES_NO_DISABLED is just awful IMHO
> compared to the original desriptive name.
Is it just a matter of coming up with a better name? Maybe:
VIR_TRISTATE_ABSENT = 0,
VIR_TRISTATE_NO,
VIR_TRISTATE_YES,
def->os.bios.useserial = VIR_TRISTATE_NO;
if (def->data.spice.filetransfer) {
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<filetransfer enable='%s'/>\n",
virTristateToString(def->data.spice.filetransfer));
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
