On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 10:07 -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > On 03/07/2012 02:12 PM, Sharad Mishra wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 14:55 -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > >> From: "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" <[email protected]> > >> > >> This code is based on the VSMigrationService for the job creation and on > >> ComputerSystemIndication for the job thread, which will listen for the > >> respective domain event to mark the job as finished. > >> > >> I am still not able to test this feature in my environment, every call to > >> CBGetInstance fails with code error 100. This is happening in other places > >> of > >> the codebase, not only the ComputerSystem provider, but also > >> ElementConfors, > >> for instance. Please use the test case send in previous email for > >> reference. > > > > Eduardo, It is not clear if you started seeing this error code after > > applying this patch or were you getting it before. > > It already happens with other test cases that will cause the provider to > make a call such as CBGetInstance, CBCreateInstance and others from the > same family. For example, test ElementConforms/02_reverse.py fails with > the same error code 100, with or without this patch applied. I suspect > it can be something messed up with my environment.
I have not seen that issue, so I suspect it is your environment. What level of libcmpiutil are you running? -Sharad > > Best regards, Eduardo > > _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
