On 03/20/2013 11:46 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote: > Hi, John > These were recoded patches, removing script for bridge patch > is removed, please add yours after it. > After reconsideration, I think we should stick to libvirt 0.9.0 > for libvirt-cim0.6.2, which makes 0.6.2 as steady version and allow > user to update to it without any trouble. After it we can raise > the libvirt version requirement in config file. > Also please add signed-off in your patches. > > Many thanks. >
I'll repost the bridge patch tomorrow at some point. As for 0.9.0 vs. later - I understand your position, maybe there's some other mechanism that would allow the "choice" for someone to build using a later version that would allow the use of those All API's. What I don't know/understand is when libvirt-cim is built, is a 0.9.0 environment used? Not that it should matter, but I guess I'm just curious. For those patches I had questions/issues with - just post an update and let's take it from there. I don't think you have to repost the whole series unless that's what DV would prefer. I'm not sure what you mean by "add signed-off in your patches". I'm still a bit of a novice w/ git and the process. John _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
