On 02/02/2011, at 4:39 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm just starting to take a look at guest networking performance and am a > little disappointed. I'm comparing two setups: > > Host: Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V > Guest: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 > > Host: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 kvm running libvirt > Guest: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 > > The guests are essentially identical except that I'm running the Microsoft > Linux Integration Components synthetic drivers on the windows hosted VM. The > libvirt setup uses bridged networking. Running bonnie++ on a nfs mounted > filesystem on each guest I'm seeing the libvirt hosted guest get between > 16%-35% of the performance of the Hyper-V guest. Is this expected? Is there > anything I can do to increase network performance of the kvm guest?
Hi Orion, Just as an initial question, if the CentOS 5.5 guest using the VirtIO network drivers? It's been ages since I used CentOS 5.x, so I don't remember if they're the default or not. That's the initial "big performance boost" thing that's needed over the emulation type drivers. To check, take a look at the XML definition for the guest, and look at the networking interface. There should be an element there called "model", and it will contain the type of network card being emulated. If it's anything other than "virtio" then an emulated network driver interface is being used. (not real fast) I'd give you a direct URL for the XML to reference, but ironically the libvirt.org server appears to be offline at the moment (doesn't happen very often thankfully!). Heh. Hope that helps. Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
