Hi,
I noticed that libvirt support the following hypervisors currently:
* The KVM/QEMU <http://libvirt.org/drvqemu.html> Linux hypervisor
* The Xen <http://libvirt.org/drvxen.html> hypervisor on Linux and
Solaris hosts.
* The LXC <http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html> Linux container system
* The OpenVZ <http://libvirt.org/drvopenvz.html> Linux container system
* The User Mode Linux <http://libvirt.org/drvuml.html> paravirtualized
kernel
* The VirtualBox <http://libvirt.org/drvvbox.html> hypervisor
* The VMware ESX and GSX <http://libvirt.org/drvesx.html> hypervisors
* The VMware Workstation and Player
<http://libvirt.org/drvvmware.html> hypervisors
* The Microsoft Hyper-V <http://libvirt.org/drvhyperv.html> hypervisor
/"the goal of libvirt: *to provide a common and stable layer sufficient
to securely manage domains on a node, possibly remote*."/
My question is, does redhat's libvirt team have the plan to support IBM
PowerVM hypervisor? If the answer is NO, what's the reason to make the
support for IBM PowerVM hypervisor doesn't make sense...
BRs,
Dennis
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
