Hi I have a test environment where a single LVM volume group is used both as a storage pool for virtual machines' disks AND for the LVs used for the HOST system filesystem.
I never use libvirt commands to start/stop/activate the pool. Only to create/delete volumes. The test environment works fine. How suitable would be a shared VG for a production environment ? thanks, Edoardo Comar PS - This discussion seems to imply that separate VGs give more safety against data corruption in case of bugs ... did not point to real cases of failure. http://serverfault.com/questions/200728/lvm-volume-group-shared-between-kvm-libvirt-host-and-guests-is-this-a-bad-idea Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
