You have two choices for the backup virtio interface:
1) it can be a macvtap device connected to the PF of the same
SRIOV device.
2) it can be a standard tap device connected to a Linux host bridge
(created outside libvirt in the host system network config) that is
attached to the PF (or alternately one of the VFs that isn't being
used
for VMs, or to another physical ethernet adapter on the host that is
connected to the same network.
-------
Best Regards,
Yalan Zhang
IRC: yalzhang
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 6:50 AM Laine Stump <la...@redhat.com
<mailto:la...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 3/21/20 1:08 AM, Yalan Zhang wrote:
> In my understanding, the standby and primary hostdev
interface
may be in
> different subnet.
There is only one hostdev device in the team pair (that will
be the one
with <teaming type='transient'.../> since it needs to be
unplugged
during migration). The other device must be a virtio device
(the one
with <teaming type='persistent'/>). And no, they cannot be on
different
subnets. They must both connect into the same ethernet
"collision
domain", such that the guest could assign the same IP address
to either
of them and be able to communicate on the network.
There is some explanation of the use case for this option.
and some
example config, here:
https://www.libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsTeaming
> I'm not sure whether it is correct. Could you please help to
explain?
> Thank you in advance.
>
> For example, primary hostdev is connected to vf-pool with
<pf='eth0'/>,
> while the standby is connected to NAT network with " forward
dev='eth0'".
> The standby interface will get ip as 192.168.122.x, but after
NAT, it
> will be in the same subnet of the vf.
>
> So after the VF is unplugged, the packet will still
broadcast in the
> same subnet, and the vm will get the packet as the standby
share the
> same mac. Right?
No, not right :-)
The VF of an SRIOV network adapter is connected directly to the
physical
network, and will have an IP address that is on that network.
Tap
devices plugged into the default network (or any other
libvirt network
based on a bridge device that is created/managed by libvirt)
have no
direct connection to the physical network, and are on a
different
subnet. The fact that traffic from the guest *seems* to be
coming from
an IP on the physical subnet is meaningless. The *guest*
needs to be
able to use both NICs using the same IP address, and anything
plugged
into the default network will need to have an IP address on a
different
subnet from the perspective of the guest.
You have two choices for the backup virtio interface:
1) it can be a macvtap device connected to the PF of the same
SRIOV
device.
2) it can be a standard tap device connected to a Linux host
bridge
(created outside libvirt in the host system network config)
that is
attached to the PF (or alternately one of the VFs that isn't
being used
for VMs, or to another physical ethernet adapter on the host
that is
connected to the same network.
It is simplest to have the same name refer to the connection
on the
source and destination hosts of a migration. That can be
handled by
creating a libvirt network to refer to the bridge device created
outside
libvirt (or to the PF directly if you're going to use macvtap.
For example, if you're going to use macvtap, and the PF's
name on the
host is ens4f0, you'd just create this network:
<network>
<name>persistent-net</name>
<forward mode='bridge'>
<interface dev='ens4f0'/>
</forward>
<network>
any guest interface with this:
<interface type='network'>
<source network='persistent-net'/>
<mac address='00:11:22:33:44:55'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<teaming type='persistent'/>
<alias name='ua-backup0'/>
</interface>
will get a macvtap device that's connected to ens4f0 in
bridge mode.
Or, if your host has a bridge device called br0 that is directly
attached to the physical network (in whatever manner, it doesn't
matter), you can define the network this way:
<network>
<name>persistent-net</name>
<bridge name='br0'/>
<forward mode='bridge'/>
<network>
The XML for the guest interface would be the same.
Then for the vfio (transient) interface, you could also define a
network:
<network>
<name>transient-net</name>
<forward mode='hostdev'>
<pf dev='ens4f0'/>
</forward>
</network>
and instead of using <interface type='hostdev'> in the guest
config,
you
would use this:
<interface type='network'>
<source network='transient-net'/>
<model type='virtio'/> [1]
<mac address='00:11:22:33:44:55'/>
<teaming type='transient' persistent='ua-backup0'/>
</interface>
Even if the device names change on the other host (the
destination of
the migration), as long as the other host has networks named
"persistent-net" and "transient-net" that are of similar
types (macvtap
or bridged for persistent-net, and hostdev for transient-net)
then
libvirt will be able to migrate the guest from one host to
the other
with no mangling of the XML required.
