Mon May 25 07:56:33 2009: Request 45546 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by RPAGITSCH
       Queue: Win32-PerfLib
     Subject: Unable to monitior the CPU processor time for a dual processor
   Broken in: (no value)
    Severity: Critical
       Owner: Nobody
  Requestors: sivak...@cisco.com
      Status: open
 Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45546 >


Hi Siva,

Do you have tried the module Win32-Process-Perf, which is similar, but
monitor processes only?
But I can not say how it works with a dual processor, because I have
only a single processor PC.

regards,

Reinhard



On Mi. 29. Apr. 2009, 11:45:38, sivakbal wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply. I tried with the Total Processor Time
parameter,
> but it did not help me. The output returned was 0 for all the PID. Do we
> have any other way to fix it? 
> 
> Your help is appreciated.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Siva 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Luebkert via RT [mailto:bug-win32-perf...@rt.cpan.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:41 PM
> To: sivak...@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #45546] Unable to monitior the CPU processor
time
> for a dual processor
> 
> <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45546 >
> 
> Siva via RT wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Experts,
> > 
> > I need your help to get my problem solved. I use Win32::perfLib module 
> > to monitor my system resource utilization. It is a dual CPU machine.
> > Except Processor time, all other values are recorded properly. 
> > 
> > The processor time varies somewhere between 0 -180%. I guess it is due 
> > to dual CPU. Is there anything that we can do to make the output 
> > similar to the one in Task manager? I need this script to work for my 
> > performance testing.
> 
> What if you were to switch and use '% Total Processor Time' instead of '%
> Processor Time' ?  I'm not sure how the Taskmgr handles it since I
only have
> a single CPU.
> 



Reply via email to