bulk 88 wrote on 2012-10-14:
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>> To: bul...@hotmail.com
>> CC: libwin32@perl.org; modu...@perl.org
>> Subject: Re: "Win32::API::Callback::IATPatch" name for DLL/SO hooker
>> for Win32::API
>> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:25:31 +0200
>> From: cos...@streppone.it
>> 
>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:12:50 +0200, Cosimo Streppone
>> <cos...@streppone.it>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'll have a look at your pull request and reply within 24 hours.
>> 
>> Your pull request is now fully merged.
>> I have looked at the commits and it's clear that this is way over my
>> head now.
>> 
>> I think it makes sense to give you co-maint of Win32::API.
>> Your CPAN id is BULKDD, right?
>> 
>> In the meantime, I pushed 0.71 to CPAN.
>> 
>> --
>> Cosimo
> 
> My CPAN ID is BULKDD see http://search.cpan.org/~bulkdd/ . It is a
> derivative of my online username bulk88. There is an unauthorized
> release of Win32::API there so that account is me. Also the unauth
> release did get a PASS cpantesters report,
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f87f09c0-3a6b-1015-863c-
> 2ca505085451 . My plans in the near future once I get the pause
> permission is to close the fixed tickets on CPAN RT if that is ok.
Thank
> you for the CPAN release. My goal is to get feedback or bug reports
for
> all my changes to Win32::API from the public.
>

Great to see this released to CPAN, but a small patch of mine for
skipping tests when fork() is not available was missed.

I produced it in the course of testing [perl #33096], and the patch was
attached there. I've attached it here too for convenience. Would you
like me to log a CPAN ticket for this, or will you take it from here?

PS. Purely out of curiosity, what is the reason for your online username
'bulk88'?!

Attachment: nofork.patch
Description: nofork.patch

Reply via email to