Would it be worthwhile to mention required parents? For example, <tr>
doesn't mean much without an enclosing <td>.
Will this module also include information about boolean attributes?
I think I like HTML::Tags best so far.
--
Mac :})
----- Original Message -----
From: Sean M. Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 27 December, 1999 15:09
Subject: HTML::Known, containing HTML parameters
> A few days back we kicked around the idea of having one module
> containing all the facts about all the HTML tags. Here's my first
> stab at such a thing, made by just combining things from Element,
> TreeBuilder, and LinkExtor. Thoughts, anyone?
>
> (Suggestions for the name are especially welcome. So far I've
> considered HTML::Tags, but that's bad because it's too close to
> HTML::Element, and HTML::DocType, which is not so good because it
> implicates this is a DTD, or the kind of information you'd find in a
> DTD.)
