Sander van Zoest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> > Silly question, how would you "behave" if the last two fields were
> > conflicting: e.g. Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:50:28 -0400 (PDT)
> > Not that I think parsing that format is a bad idea, but just that how
> > to handle bad data should be defined going into it. :)
>
> I am not really sure how you would determine which would be the "correct"
> one, but I would favor for the ISO number value.
Agree. Things inside () in email headers are generally just comments
and should be ignored.
> I guess, if you wanted to, you could throw an error or return undef if
> PDT doesn't match the ISO number value. Granted this would require
> Time::Zone to make the comparison. On systems without Time::Zone you
> could simply ignore it.
Let's just always ignore it.
Regards,
Gisle
