Quoting Gisle Aas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In fact, I think I'll pester you directly for the next thing -- I was > > just wondering if you had any plans to change Net::HTTP (as you > > threaten in the documentation). If so, let me put in a feature request. > > I think the interface is pretty good now and will basically stay that > way.
Good, I don't want the interface to change. The _rbuf method is the only one that makes me nervous, but it's probably necessary as long as IO::Handles can't unget? > What I suggest is this: .. .. .. > In this way it should be easy to reuse this stuff anyway you like. > > Does this sound like a plan? Sounds good to me! > Can anybody suggest a better name than 'Net::HTTP::Methods'? Net::HTTP::Protocol? ::Process?
