Thats better

$ lwp-request -des  -H'User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)' -H'Accept-Encoding: deflate'
http://www.boostworks.com/customers/index.html
200 GZIP follows
Connection: Keep-Alive
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:18:30 GMT
ETag: "ad59b-3fea-3e4aa43a"
Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) PHP/4.0.6
Content-Encoding: deflate
Content-Type: text/html
Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:44:58 GMT
Client-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:38:22 GMT
Client-Response-Num: 1
Client-Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 March 2003 12:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mike Simons'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Net::HTTP does not use compressed transfers when it should
>
>
> It's been quite a while since I tested against their site, so perhaps they
> have changed how they are doing compression, or perhaps they have
> dropped it
> altogether.
>
> Take a look at BoostWorks' customer list here:
> http://www.boostworks.com/customers/index.html
>
> You may find a site from this list that works.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> ---
> David Carter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Marquess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 6:21 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mike Simons'
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Net::HTTP does not use compressed transfers when it should
> >
> > This is pretending to be IE 6. No Content_Encoding header sent back
> > though.
> >
> > $ lwp-request -des  -H'User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> > Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)' -H'Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate'
> > http://www.homedepot.com
> > 200 OK
> > Connection: close
> > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:16:27 GMT
> > Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1
> > Content-Length: 3733
> > Content-Type: text/html
> > Client-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:16:05 GMT
> > Client-Response-Num: 1
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 26 March 2003 10:49
> > > To: 'Mike Simons'; 'Paul Marquess'
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Net::HTTP does not use compressed transfers when
> it should
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry - you'll need to masquerade as Internet Explorer, or some other
> > > browser (& version) "known" by their HTTP accelerator to support
> > > deflate, in
> > > addition to using an "accept-encoding" header.
> > >
> > > I don't have my code on this computer, or I'd send it to you
> > > right now. I'll
> > > try to post a snippet when I get to the office.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > David Carter
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mike Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:53 AM
> > > > To: David Carter; Paul Marquess
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: Net::HTTP does not use compressed transfers when it
> > should
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:42:15PM -0500, Mike Simons wrote:
> > > > > - Does anyone know of apache support for transfer-encoding?
> > > > > - Does anyone know of linux web applications that use TE:?
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:44:21AM -0500, David Carter wrote:
> > > > > > No need to teach mod_gzip deflate for testing - just find a site
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > internet that already emits "Content-encoding: deflate" & test
> > with
> > > > it.
> > > > > > Such as http://www.homedepot.com
> > > > >
> > > > >   Very good point... thanks for the URL, I'll try that first.  ;)
> > > >
> > > >   Hrmmm... I'm not seeing data sent back compressed.  I've
> tried lynx,
> > > > my own get.pl test program, and mozilla.  I see the mozilla request
> > > > advertise "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, compress;q=0.9"  but the
> > > > results comes back in the clear.
> > > >
> > > > - Could you provide the headers from a sample request that will get
> > > >   deflate data out of it?
> > > > - Does anyone else know of a site that sends 'deflate'
> style replies?
> > > >
> > > >     Thanks,
> > > >       Mike Simons
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to