Oops, forgot to Cc: list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:46:00 +0100 (BST) From: John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Need help...
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You want LWP to break spec just to conform to dodgy browsers? I agree with Sean that this a good idea in this case: it's universal, and has been for years, and everybody relies on it. It's far too late to fix. 301 is more debatable (IIRC lynx still offers a choice on 301, for example). http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell/www/post-redirect.html > Why not follow the spec but have a flag for the other behaviour. [...] Can you suggest a use for such a flag? I don't think one exists. John
