On Dec 15 Jim Martinez wrote:
> On Dec 13 Andy Lester wrote:
>
> > I'm glad to see you usin' Mech for testing. My two favorite hats:
> > Testing and Mech!
>
> Trying to wear those two hats, I replaced the <SELECT ...
> multiple='multiple'> with checkboxes and had problems.
>
> > Yes, that is a shortcoming of Mech. I'm going to try to fix it this
> > weekend.
I left the <SELECT multiple="multiple"> and when to checkboxes.
The checkbox problem was not really a problem. I just was mixing
Test::More and WWW::Mechanize incorrectly.
A sample of what I tried (that didn't work):
ok($a->tick(city => '109'), "set city to 109"); # always not ok
ok($a->click('submit'),"click the done button");
what works:
$a->tick(city => '109');
# and many other ticks done here
ok($a->click('submit'),"click the done button");
In other words, the ->tick shouldn't be inside of ok. Instead I now do
all the ->ticks that I want (with no ok) and then do an ok on the ->click
method.
> So I ran the tick.t script that comes with WWW::Mechanize which had
> problems, claiming there is nor form number 1, but I see one in the
> tick.html file.
I think that was just an environment problem, and my escapist mind trying
to figure out what was wrong. The tick.t works fine when I run a "make
test"
WWW::Mechanize is working out just fine.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]$ perl tick.t
> 1..6
> ok 1 - use WWW::Mechanize;
> ok 2 - The object isa WWW::Mechanize
> ok 3 - URI shouldn't be an object
> not ok 4 - file:/home/jjm/.cpan/build/WWW-Mechanize-0.70/t/t/tick.html
> # Failed test (tick.t at line 15)
> There is no form numbered 1 at tick.t line 17
> Can't call method "find_input" on an undefined value at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/WWW/Mechanize.pm line 597.
> # Looks like you planned 6 tests but only ran 4.
> # Looks like your test died just after 4.
Jim
