Tim Brody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But anyway, paging URI maintainer(s), respond please! > (Can I invade URI::openurl, or can we shift this module into the URI > distro.?)
I tried to skim the spec and your manpage and I still don't really understand what this is supposed to do. I does not look like openurl: is really supposed to be a URI scheme. The names URL::xxx where xxx is all lowercase is reserved for proper schemes. I suggest you make your thing occupy the URI::OpenURL namespace and that you should not try to subclass URI. Just make your thing reference and delegate to URI objects where it makes sense. I don't think OpenURL fit in the URI distribution, so it is best distributed separately. The term ContextObject seems central. Looks like you should have a class called URI::OpenURL::Context that you instantiate in the API. Regards, Gisle
