Gisle Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matt Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > But the Content-Length header for the request itself will be added by > the protocol handler if the request does not have any. It means that > not adding the Content-Length to the request itself should make no > difference for the server. > [...] >> What are the chances of a (possibly modified) version of my patch making >> it into libwww-perl proper? I'm open to suggestions... > > I'm willing to apply the following patch if you can confirm that it > fixes your problem.
Gisle & all, The patch/change in LWP 5.8 fixed the problem for me, sorry for the lateness in my reply! I finally got around to upgrading and testing today. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Learn to love and love to learn. http://www.visi.com/~mattc/ 0111 ftp://ftp.visi.com/users/mattc/ 5468652073656372657420697320131b331b2e1b311b341b311b351b39110d0a
