Norbert Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 04:44 -0700, Gisle Aas wrote:
> > Norbert Kiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I tried to use ->ignore_tags(()) and ->ignore_tags(qw(none)), but it
> > > seems that after calling ->report_tags() once it alsways uses a positive
> > > tag filter.
> >
> > Calling ->report_tags() without any arguments should reset the filter.
>
> Thanks, just tested it and it works beautifully. Perhaps this
> information could be added to the manual or FAQ?
Documenting this better would be a good idea. I'll try to do get it
done for the next release. Patches welcome.
> Also, what is the semantics of combining ->ignore_tags() and
> ->report_tags()? My understanding is that the last call wins, i.e. it
> replaces (instead of modifies) the internal filter. Is this correct?
If both ignore_tags and report_tags are set then they both filter out
events and ignore_tags effectively takes precendence. For example:
$p->ignore_tags("a");
$p->report_tags("a", "b");
Only "b" will be reported. This should probably also be documented
better.
Regards,
Gisle
