On 8/6/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/6/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think pat's right. rather than waste any more time, lets just fork > > > the dang thing. > > > > I agree its would be good to get going. But do we really need to fork > > just to get checkin privileges? Its just such an awful way of trying to > > reestablish checkin privileges. > > Unfortunately, without Sean Chittenden there's no way to get admin > privileges, and no one can get hold of Sean (again). So we're stuck in > the water without a paddle. I don't know what else to do but fork. > > Also, I should point out that this has happened twice before. In fact, > the last time I tried to move this project forward Sean appeared out > of NOWHERE to take admin control back. I wasn't happy about it. And > just as I suspected, here we are again w/o Sean. -- I don't want to > ever have to go through this again.
I think that plenty of goodwill has been shown. It's time to start a new project with a couple of admins (both of whom should have a long history of hanging around). Whether or not the new project starts with libXML code is a decision for a different discussion (one held among the admins and coders). Trans, go ahead and start up a new project. Let me know what I can do to help. > > T. > _______________________________________________ > libxml-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel > -- thanks, -pate ------------------------- Duty makes us do things, Love make us do things well. http://on-ruby.blogspot.com http://on-erlang.blogspot.com http://on-soccer.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
