> For SWIG I implemented support for mapping between C pointers and > Ruby objects by using a Hash Table (ruby's built in one, > st_table). That allows you to enforce a one-to-one Ruby to C > object mapping. Do we want to do something like that here?
It doesn't exist now and I'm inclined to say that adding it would be a bad idea. Sadly, I think the library needs to be more aggressive about dup'ing data. -sc PS This is one of the primary reasons I use D as a programming language these days instead of Ruby. <:~) _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
