On 8/23/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the second case the version numbers can diverge. So it allows a > > little more independence between the two libs. The downside is that > > one has to keep track of which version of libxml to use for a > > particular version of libxslt. Not a big deal, really, but there it is > > nonetheless. Also, something to consider, for this last option, it > > would be possible to move the libxslt lib over to it's own Rubyforge > > project (which already exists actually). Maybe that's a better idea? > > I'd vote a separate project.
Sean told me he was indifferent, but half-suggested that we might merge the two libs completely. I'm not qualified enough to make that call. But Charlie's makes at least one vote for the separate project/repo. So unless any of you have anything else to add, I'm leaning toward that approach. Let me know as soon as you can. I'd like to get this taken care of over the weekend. Thanks, T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
