Nope! :) libxsl is a much simpler animal compared to libxml. -sc
-- Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sep 12, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Stephanie Collett wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been using libxml to consume xml web service responses for a > few months and it has been great. Now I am looking at using the > libxslt library to do some xslt transformations. However, I have been > catching up on the list messages about the memory management issues > with the current stable release of libxml. Does the libxslt project > have the same memory issues? Or does the libxslt wrapper access the > xml and xslt libraries differently? > > -Stephanie > > PS. Thanks for reviving libxml. The project has really progressed in > the past couple of months. > _______________________________________________ > libxml-devel mailing list > libxml-devel@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
