On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:57 -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > >> Is there any reason to nuke 'em? -sc > > > > I was thinking more along the lines of whether there is any reason > > to keep them. > > > > My thinking in getting rid of them is the repository will have less > > clutter (less code) and check out times will be significantly > > reduced. Since they are now dead code, having them hang around just > > adds to the mental burden of getting up to speed with the library. > > > Oh yeah! @#!$ Subversion. :( Hrm. Tom says he's going to add > mercurial support next to rubyforge so I'd hold onto 'em for the time > being since that overhead will vanish upon import. <:~] -sc
Been away for a bit, so sorry for the time lag, but.... doesn't this aspect of SVN sorta defeat the purpose of a VCS? (not wanting to start/continue VCS wars, btw). I agree with Sean. They should all be kept until migration to a different/better tool, otherwise you might as well start nuking them after every release. ;) ast -- Andrew S. Townley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://atownley.org _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
