So I don't see this as a bug in the libxml bindings.Maybe you are right, but if I change XML::Document.file("test.xml") to File.open("test.xml"), I won't run out of file handles. I wonder what makes the difference...
Well, File.open is a ruby method while Document.open is a libxml method. Perhaps Ruby has some smarts built into it with File.open and the garbage collector.
And if I remember correctly, even the original test code with libxml-ruby 3.8 did not run out of file handles on 32bit intel machines either - the reported segfault only affected the amd64 (and maybe other) architecture.
Interesting. Could be a difference in libxml, or maybe a difference in the bindings. Would have to check svn to know for sure.
Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
